Here For It: Janet Jackson Longtime Friend Gil Duldulao Shuts Down Haters Over Gold Digger Claims/Prenup Deal, Janet Would Not “Want or Accept $500 Mil” From Wissam Al Mana

Posted April 21, 2017


Once it was announced that Janet Jackson and husband Wissam Al Mana were calling it quits, word regarding their prenup hit the net and it was reported that after five years of marriage, Janet would clock in a massive 500 million payday from the millionaire tycoon, as part of their prenup agreement.

Well now Janet’s long time friend and creative director, Gil Duldulao took to social media to clap back at haters insinuating that Janet planned this divorce and having her baby as a big pay day. Some may have forgotten that Janet has BEEN a boss and has her own money, enough of her own wealth to buy and sell the opinions of all her haters, three times over.

Gil was not here for the critics and took to social media to defend  her honor.

“Hi. I want to state what I have to say as a friend,” he began. “Even if there was a possibility that my friend could make $500 mil off of having a child. It’s not in her character to want and or accept 500 mil. It’s character people and she is not the one.”

“She would never accept a pay out or want a pay out,” Duldulao continued. “That’s the human being I know. So you f–kers that state that—f–k you. That’s not my friend and will never be. Point blank period. AND if you checked your facts. She has been married for four years not 5 and something months to claim she will get 500mil. So keep trying you a–holes. Goodbye.”

He also took to Twitter to clap back at haters.

F you

A post shared by Gil Duldulao (@ghsduldulao) on

INSTAGRAM Janet Jackson may be rocking out shows all over the
INSTAGRAM Teyana Taylor has finally met her icon and biggest inspiration,

Subscribe to Jojocrews via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Search the site

Looking for something in particular?

JoJo's Current Playlist

The Archive

Looking for something in particular?